Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Observations From the Back Row: 7-19-11

...
“De Omnibus Dubitandum”


Greenhouse Gas Theory Trashed in replicated Lab Experiment
by John O'Sullivan

Professor Nahle of Monterrey, Mexico backed by a team of international scientists has faithfully recreated a famous experiment from 1909 to confirm that the greenhouse effect cannot cause global warming.

Astonishingly, the 1909 greenhouse gas experiment first performed by Professor Robert W. Wood at John Hopkins University hadn’t been replicated for a century. This despite over $100 billion spent by the man-made global warming industry trying to prove its case that carbon dioxide is a dangerous atmospheric pollutant.
The analogy had been that greenhouse gases (e.g. CO2) act like the glass in a greenhouse trapping heat in Earth’s atmosphere and if they build up (due to human industrial emissions) the planet would dangerously overheat.

Nahle Nails Shut Climate Scare Coffin

At the Biology Cabinet laboratories Professor Nahle was able to confirm the astounding findings: Wood was right all along. After peer-review the results confirm that the so-called ‘greenhouse effect’ is solely due to the blockage of convective heat transfer within the environment in which it is contained i.e. as in this case, a lab flask.

Indeed, it is the glass of the lab flask (or ‘greenhouse’) that caused the “trapped” radiation all along. The flask (or greenhouse) being what scientists refer to as a ‘closed system’; while Earth’s atmosphere isn’t closed at all but rather open to space allowing heat energy to freely escape.......

Romney backpedalling
Mitt Romney says he doesn’t think carbon pollution threatens human health and would not green light EPA climate regulations if he were in the White House. The GOP presidential candidate signaled the reversal to one of the Obama administration's top environmental policies during a town hall meeting Thursday in Derry, N.H. This came about six weeks after he acknowledged during a campaign stop that global warming is real, a statement that won him praise from Al Gore.

"I think we may have made a mistake," Romney said Thursday in response to a voter's question about EPA regulating air pollution from coal plants under the Clean Air Act. "We have made a mistake is what I believe, in saying that the EPA should regulate carbon emissions. I don’t think that was the intent of the original legislation, and I don’t think carbon is a pollutant in the sense of harming our bodies.


My Take - The man is amazing. To those who have been watching this from the beginning it has been obvious that AGW was nothing more than a fraudulent attempt (as stated by Jacques Chirac) at world governance. Yet this man, who just as his peers, has been at the center of information for most of his adult life just now he realizes that they "may" have made as "mistake". The man can’t even say; “I made a mistake!” He “thinks” they “may” have made a “mistake”. Amazing! The man is a rock!

It is also amazing how many of these people have come to new insights regarding the green movement and AGW. I wonder what final piece of scientific information convinced ALL of them after all of this time? Wait..wait..I know. They have all been reading the polls. After all….statistics is considered a science….isn’t it? Then again it is referred to as the “arcane” science so it is a good thing he hedged his statement. After all the “science” may change with next week’s poll.


______________________________

If the green movement couldn’t use ad hominem attacks, logical fallacies, misdirection and outright lies would they be able to talk at all? Below are some examples.

The World Wildlife Federation and polar bears. Lies again!

Lord Christopher Monckton, and that waste-of-time “Lord” debate. By JoNova

EDF attacks utility with fake asthma attack?



"The time has come," the Walrus said,
"To talk of many things:
Of shoes, and ships, and sealing wax -
Of cabbages and kings,
And why the sea is boiling hot,
And whether pigs have wings."

###

No comments:

Post a Comment